Illustration for Repair Belongs in the Product Story
Issue 00 September 2026
The lead story · By Bill Leebens

Repair Belongs in the Product Story

Repairability, parts support, and service information are product decisions. They deserve a place in the story before the sale.

Read the story

WHY THIS SITE EXISTS

Bill Leebens has spent close to fifty years in high-end audio, on both sides of the show floor: the press room and the table where the launches get planned. He loves the gear and he loves the music. He has lost patience with the nonsense around them, and The Audio Cynic is where that impatience goes in print.

The money part is simple. Everything you spend here goes straight to Bill, tips and the shop alike, and nothing costs more than fifty bucks. Tip if the crank made your day, and subscribe if you want the depth layer.

The masthead

Two desks. Industry and bench.

Bill Leebens, the Audio Cynic, illustrated
The industry desk

Bill Leebens

Bill wrote “In Defense of Audiophilia” because he actually loves the music. Founding editor of Copper — 96 issues — and former Director of Marketing & Communications at PS Audio. Decades on both sides of the show floor.

Read the full story →

From the bench

Drawn from the bench.

See the Field Guide →
Illustration of a wood-cased vintage radio on a workbench, lit by an oil lamp
A set on the bench, before the verdict.
Illustration of a rack of vintage test instruments with rows of knobs on a workbench
Where a claim becomes a measurement.
Illustration of a person in a cap and vest working at a cluttered repair bench under a lamp
The fix-or-replace call, made here.

The paid depth layer

Go behind
the verdict.

Join Insider for extended notes, early access, and the material that does not fit in the public issue.

Become an Insider · $5/month or $50/year
Early issue accessRead the next issue before it reaches the public archive.
Extended desk notesThe context, caveats, and follow-up that do not fit the first edit.
Private archiveA growing record of the work behind the verdicts.

Our standard

The uncertainty stays in.

We do not take pay-for-favor. We do not invent measurements, outcomes, or bench experience. We label what is observed, documented, likely, and still waiting for a measurement.

Read the ethics statement ↗